Legal Opinion · Dissent

Peacock v. City of Miami

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 27, 1926Published

1Dissent

Brown, C. J.,

dissenting. — The burden was upon the complainants in the Court below to show by their bill that the Court was without jurisdiction of the person of the infant, John Palmer Corell, when the decree of foreclosure, signed September 27, 1911, and filed and recorded on October 3, 1911, was» rendered. It is conceded that the Court had jurisdiction of the subject matter. The record in the foreclosure suit, which by stipulation the Court was permitted to consider in connection with the demurrer to the Bill, shows that proper affidavit for publication was filed December 22, 1910, and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Kingsbury v. BucknerSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Bleakley v. BarclaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  5. Torrey v. BrunerSupreme Court of Florida · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API