Legal Opinion · Dissent

Tri-State Bonding Co. v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 12, 1978No. 77-356Published

1Dissent

George Howard, Jr., Justice,

dissenting. 1 am compelled to dissent from the majority’s opinion affirming the trial court in granting judgments on the bond forfeitures involving James Edwin Osborne in the amount of $1,700.00 and in the case of Charles Ray Hershel in the amount of $4,000.00, but reduced by the majority to $2,500.00. It is my belief that the evidence and the law justify a complete exoneration of the bondsman for the failure of these two defendants to appear in court for trial. Consequently, there was an abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court in rendering any type of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Adler v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1880
  2. Hood v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
  3. White System of Lafayette v. FisherLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API