Legal Opinion

Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 29, 2015No. 13-4533 (L)Published

1Opinion of the Court

13‐4533 (L) Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 4 August Term 2014 5 6 (Argued: March 5, 2015 Decided: September 29, 2015) 7 8 Nos. 13‐4533, 13‐4537 9 10 –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– 11 12 EXPRESSIONS HAIR DESIGN, LINDA FIACCO, THE BROOKLYN FARMACY & SODA 13 FOUNTAIN, INC., PETER FREEMAN, BUNDA STARR CORP., DONNA PABST, FIVE POINTS 14 ACADEMY, STEVE MILLES, PATIO.COM LLC, DAVID ROSS, 15 16 Plaintiffs‐Appellees, 17 18 ‐v.‐ 19 20 ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of 21 New York,…

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API