Bryant v. English
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partTom Glaze, Justice
I concur in part and dissent in part. My disagreement with the majority court has nothing to do with its holding on the merits. In fact, I totally agree with its decision as it pertains to the merits, but disagree that this court procedurally reached the merits.
This lawsuit is a declaratory judgment action and, as such, requires that a present actual controversy must exist. In stating this well-recognized principle, this court stated the following:
The Declaratory Judgment Statute is applicable only where there is a present actual controversy, and all interested persons are made parties, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Andres v. First Ark. Development Finance Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
- Files v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Robinson v. Arkansas State Game & Fish CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
- Block v. AllenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
- McFarlin v. KellySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.