Legal Opinion · Dissent

Laffit Pincay, Jr. Christopher J. McCarron v. Vincent S. Andrews Robert Andrews Vincent Andrews Management Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 15, 2004No. 02-56577Published

1Dissent

KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge, with whom Judges RYMER and McKEOWN join,

dissenting:

We must never forget that it is “excusable neglect” we are expounding. Before Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. Partnership, 507 U.S. 380, 113 S.Ct. 1489, 123 L.Ed.2d 74 (1993), four circuits had forgotten; they interpreted this phrase as “requiring a showing that the delay was caused by circumstances beyond the movant’s control.” Id. at 387 n. 3, 113 S.Ct. 1489. But how could circumstances beyond one’s control be neglect? A jurisprudence that refused to excuse anything one could fairly call…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Silivanch v. Celebrity Cruises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. TorresCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  4. Margaret Lowry, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. McDonnell Douglas Corporation, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  5. Gale PRIZEVOITS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INDIANA BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API