Legal Opinion

Valz v. Sheepshead Bay Bungalow Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 24, 1927PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKapper, J.

The action is to set aside and declare null and void a judgment and sale of real property in foreclosure upon the ground that the plaintiffs, who are the sole heirs at law of the mortgagor, had not been served with the summons in the action. The mortgage was for $25,000 upon property in the borough of Brooklyn owned by Antonio M. Valz, a resident of the State of Virginia, and which, upon foreclosure sale on January 31, 1918, brought but $10,000, the deficiency judgment being above $15,000. The property has since been frequently transferred and improved so that it is said to be now worth…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stuyvesant v. . WeilNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Mishkind-Feinberg Realty Co. v. . SidorskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  3. Davidson v. Laclede Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  4. Otis v. EppersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
  5. Brisbane v. PeabodyNew York Supreme Court · 1847

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Air Conditioning Training Corp. v. PirroteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
  2. Stewart v. Transcontinental Car Forwarding Co.New York Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Toubin v. WhiteNew York Supreme Court · 1956
  4. PSALIDASBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API