Legal Opinion

In Re: Jordana Marinkovic Bauman

District Court, S.D. California

Decided February 21, 2025No. 3:24-cv-01564Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 IN RE: JORDANA M. BAUMAN, Case No.: 24-CV-1564 JLS (BLM) 12 Debtor, ORDER: 13 14 (1) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART APPELLANT’S 15 MEL MARIN, MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO 16 Appellant, PERFECT THE RECORD AND FILE BRIEF AND TO STRIKE 17 APPELLEE’S SUBMISSION FOR 18 MICHAEL KOCH, THE RECORD AND AFFIRMATION Appellee. IN SUPPORT, AND 19 20 (2) DENYING APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR STAY PENDING 21 APPEAL TO ALLOW LOWER 22 COURT TO PERFECT THE RECORD 23 (ECF Nos. 22, 24) 24 25 Presently before the Court is Appellant Mel…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Abrams v. Sea Palms Associates, Ltd. (In Re Abrams)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  2. Trigny Corp. v. GroshongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API