Legal Opinion
Glickman v. Commonwealth
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 28, 1923PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.
The petitioner alleges that in December, 1907, the armory commissioners took in fee a certain parcel of land adjoining her land, for and in the name of the Commonwealth under St. 1907, c. 526; that on the parcel so taken there was an armory of the first class then completed or in process of construction, which has since been maintained with its grounds as a State armory; that in 1908, without objection by the petitioner’s predecessor in title, the commissioners constructed a permanent wall and an embankment of heavy stone on the northwesterly side of the armory building upon the land now…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Murdock Parlor Grate Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
- McArthur Bro's v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Nash v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
- Central Mills Co. v. HartMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
- Stevenson v. DonnellyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Marrapese v. Rhode IslandDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1980
- Broadhurst v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- General Electric Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
- DeRoche v. Massachusetts Commission Against DiscriminationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
- Executive Air Service, Inc. v. Division of Fisheries & GameMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.