Cohen v. M. Keizer, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
Plaintiff established prima facie a right to rescind on the ground of fraud on the part of the corporate defendant, M. Keizer, Inc., the fraudulent vendee, and to seek to reclaim in an action of replevin, not only against such vendee, but also against the defendant Brieff. (Devoe v. Brandt, 53 N. Y. 462; Stevens v. Brennan, 79 id. 254; Goodwin v. Wertheimer, 99 id. 149.) It was error, therefore, to dismiss the complaint on the ground that an action in replevin would not he. The sufficiency of the title of the defendant Brieff would depend upon whether he purchased in good faith, for value and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Employers' Fire Insurance v. CottenNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Devoe v. . BrandtNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Converse v. . SicklesNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Heinrich v. Van WricklerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
3Cited by12 opinions
- Guggenheim Foundation v. LubellNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Kunstsammlungen Zu Weimar v. ElicofonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1981
- Menzel v. ListNew York Supreme Court · 1966
- Grosz v. Museum of Modern ArtDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Kunstsammlungen Zu Weimar v. ElicofonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.