S. A. Brown & Co. v. School District No. 84
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Neosho District Court. Action by E. C. Robinson and Owen McNulty, doing business as 8. A. Brown & Co., against School District No. 84, Neosho county, to foreclose a material-man’s lien for the erection of a school-house. On a judgment for defendant, on demurrer to the petition, plaintiff's bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Green, C.:
This was an action to foreclose a material-man’s lien, commenced in the district court of Neosho county. It was alleged in the petition that S. A. Brown and Owen McNulty, a firm doing business under the name of S. A. Brown & Co., furnished the lumber and building material, for which a lieu was claimed, to John S. Huntley, who had the contract for the erection of the school-house for the defendant iu error; that subsequent to the furnishing of the lumber and material, and prior to filing the statement for a lien, S. A. Brown retired from the firm and was succeeded by E. C.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Skyrme v. Occidental Mill & Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1873
- Davis v. BilslandSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Iaege v. BossieuxSupreme Court of Virginia · 1859
- Weaver v. SellsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
- German Bank v. SchlothSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sandusky Grain Co. v. Borden's Condensed Milk Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Milwaukee Mechanics' Insurance v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1896
- National Bond & Investment Co. v. Midwest Finance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943
- Midland Valley R. Co. v. McLemoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Weaves v. LockCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1896