Legal Opinion
In Re Penn Central Transportation Company
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 25, 1974No. 70-347PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDERS Nos. 1702 and 42
FULLAM, District Judge.
Petitioner, Prolerized Schiabo-Neu Company (“Prolerized”), seeks to recover $8,500 deposited with the railroads in connection with its agreement to purchase 6.44 acres of land, located in Greenville Yard, New Jersey. The land to be sold under the agreement was, and still is, owned by the Secondary Debtor and leased to the Debtor for a term of 999 years from July 1, 1871. Because Penn Central’s management failed to approve the transaction, as required by the terms of the agreement, the property was never conveyed to Prolerized.
The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Thompson v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- In Re Chicago & NW Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
- Reilly v. GriffithNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
- In Re Sayre Village Manor, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1954
- In re J. Rosen & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re L.D. Patella Construction Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
- Midlantic National Bank v. Bridge (In re Bridge)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- In Re BridgeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Robert L. Lewis & Charles M. McArthur v. Wells (In Re Bob Lee Beauty Supply Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1985