Legal Opinion
Clark v. Feder Semo and Bard, P.C.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 23, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2007-0470Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN D. BATES, United States District Judge
Before the Court is [138] defendants Joseph Semo and Howard Bard’s (collectively, “S & B”) motion seeking an award of attorney’s fees for multiple years of litigation with plaintiff Denise Clark, pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(g) and 28 U.S.C. § 1927. S & B seek attorney’s fees from both Clark and her counsel, Stephen R. Bruce. For the reasons discussed below, the Court will deny S & B’s motion..
BACKGROUND
Clark was an attorney with the law firm of Feder, Semo & Bard, P.C. (“FS & B”) for almost ten years until she left the firm in…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Carolyn J. Gibbs v. Ashley C. Gibbs, a Minor Child and Andrew F. Gibbs, a Minor Child, Intervenor v. General American Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Melvin D. Wallace and Arthur M. LevinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Lavern Marquardt, and Earline Marquardt v. North American Car CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Reuben Rivera v. Benefit Trust Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Joan Eddy, of the Estate of James Peter Eddy v. Colonial Life Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.