Legal Opinion

Ironman v. Rhoades

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 10, 1986No. 85-1719PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants appeal from a final judgment entered in favor of the defendants below. We reverse.

David Ironman and his wife Susan sued Karen Rhoades and her insurer for injuries David Ironman received as a passenger in a vehicle that was rear-ended by Rhoades. Defendants filed an answer to the complaint denying all material allegations and raising as affirmative defenses the negligence of the driver of the vehicle in which Ironman was a passenger, tort immunity under the Florida Automobile Reparations Reform Act, and the collateral source rule. The defendants did not raise “sudden brake failure”…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wood v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  2. Garfinkle v. BirniosCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Langford v. McCormickDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  2. Meaney v. RubegaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  3. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. U.S. Home Corp.Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · 1991
  4. State Paving Corp. v. ZebrowskiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API