Reeside v. United States
United States Court of Claims
By agreement these causes are to be heard together, the testimony taken in any of them to be used in the others, as far as the same is relevant and applicable. Some of the questions I propose to consider apply to all — and some again are applicable to only one or two.
Read the full summary
By agreement these causes are to be heard together, the testimony taken in any of them to be used in the others, as far as the same is relevant and applicable. Some of the questions I propose to consider apply to all — and some again are applicable to only one or two. For the-sake of convenience, and in accordance with agreement, I proceed to consider these cases together, making such distinctions, as 1 pass along, as will clearly define the cases to which the propositions respectively will apply. I shall not undertake to examine the evidence in detail, or with much critical care, hut leave…
1ConcurrenceCasey, C. J.
I agree in the findings and judgments in the cases of Higdon, Morgan, Geffroy, and Reeside. I dissent from nearly all the positions assumed in the opinion just read, and proceed to state the views I entertain in the cases. Nor is there an agreement of a majority of the court as to any of the doctrines hnnounced. The views contained in these opinions are not to be ..regarded as the decision of the court, but of the particular judges wlio delivered them, or expressly assented to them.
In July, 1861, Major General John C. Frómont was assigned by the President to the command of the department of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kendall v. United States Ex Rel. StokesSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- Nelson J. Elliott v. Samuel SwartwoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1836
- Wheeler v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
- Warren v. SkinnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1850
- Pabodie v. KingNew York Supreme Court · 1815
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.