Legal Opinion

Dunec v. Ford Motor Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1939No. Docket No. 25, Calendar No. 40,085Published

1Opinion

I am not in accord with the opinion of Mr. Justice McALLISTER. On January 25, 1935, plaintiff filed a petition for further compensation alleging that he could not secure employment by reason of the injury to his eye. After a hearing, an award was made by the deputy commissioner denying plaintiff compensation. No appeal was taken from this award of March 5, 1935, and it therefore stands as an adjudication as of that date. In May, 1937, plaintiff filed another petition for further compensation, alleging that he had lost industrial vision and could not secure employment because of the condition…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ginsberg v. Burroughs Adding Machine Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Rice v. J. F. Braun & SonMichigan Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API