Legal Opinion

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 6, 1991No. 91-261PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZEHMER, Judge.

Appellant’s conviction of third degree murder is affirmed, there being no merit to his contention that the trial court erred in refusing to reinstruct on justifiable use of deadly force. See Henry v. State, 359 So.2d 864 (Fla.1978); Reynolds v. State, 438 So.2d 190 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Gonzalez v. State, 502 So.2d 66 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Reifsnyder v. State, 428 So.2d 738 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). However, we vacate the provision in the written sentence imposing restitution, as that condition was not a part of the oral pronouncement at the sentencing hearing, and remand to accord…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Henry v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  2. Dailey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. Grice v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  4. Gonzalez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  5. Reifsnyder v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bauzon v. BauzonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. Medina v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  3. Rudd v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API