Rich Plan of Central Louisiana, Inc. v. Hawthorne
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
TATE, Judge.
The appellant did not appear in person or through counsel when this case was called for argument on the date it had been docketed for hearing, nor was any brief filed on his behalf. The appeal is therefore considered abandoned, and it will accordingly be dismissed. Rule VII, Section 4(b), Uniform Rules of the Courts of Appeal. See also: Wyatt v. Wyatt, 232 La. 467, 94 So.2d 439; Brumfield v. Giles, 231 La. 85, 90 So.2d 786, 787; Daunis v. Maryland Cas. Co., La.App. 2 Cir., 115 So.2d 225; Mitchell v. Martin, La.App. 1 Cir., 86 So.2d 211; Pharis v. Jowers, La.App. 2 Cir., 85 So.2d…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Governor Claiborne Apartments, Inc. v. AttaldoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
- Mitchell v. MartinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
- Wyatt v. WyattSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
- Brumfield v. GilesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
- Daunis v. Maryland Casualty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Allen v. CubaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960