Legal Opinion

Ketcham v. Wilbur

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 15, 1930Published

1Per curiam

The complaint states a cause of action (Ketcham v. Wilbur, 241 N. Y. 516). Upon the first trial a judgment in favor of plaintiff was reversed on the ground that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence (222 App. Div. 788). A judgment based upon a directed verdict for defendant on the second trial was reversed on the ground that a prima facie case had been made out (225 App. Div. 719). On this appeal from the judgment [order setting aside verdict] resulting from the third trial we find sufficient evidence to sustain the verdict. (McKeon v. Van Slyck, 223 N. Y. 392, 397, 398; Caldwell…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McKeon v. . Van SlyckNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Ketcham v. WilburNew York Court of Appeals · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API