Legal Opinion

People v. Hill

California Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1889No. 20498PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Application for writ of mandate to Hon. D. J. Toohy, judge of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, to compel the settlement of a bill of exceptions. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.

The appellant makes application for a mandamus to compel the judge of the court below, who has retired from' office, to settle and sign a bill of exceptions in this case.

The motion for a new trial was denied, and judgment rendered March 3,1888, and on the 12th of March fifteen days additional time was given within which to file the bill of exceptions. The affidavit of the attorney for the defendant shows that a draught of the bill was presented for settlement on the twenty-fourth day of March, but the judge who tried the case makes affidavit that it was *406never presented to him for settlement,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. SpragueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. GawithMontana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Page v. CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API