Legal Opinion

Hardy v. Brannen

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 15, 1942No. 14165PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Reid, Chief Justice.

“Where a deed or grant refers to a plat as furnishing the description of the land conveyed, the plat itself and the words and marks on it are as much a part of the grant or deed, and control so far as limits are concerned, as if such descriptive features were written out on the face of the deed or grant itself. Cragin v. Powell, 128 U. S. 691 (9 Sup. Ct. 203, 32 L. ed. 566); Schreck v. Blun, 131 Ga. 489 (62 S. E. 705); Thompson v. Hill, 137 Ga. 308 (73 S. E. 640); Aiken v. Wallace, 134 Ga. 873 (68 S. E. 937).” State v. Ga. Ry. & Power Co., 141 Ga. 153, 156 (80 S. E. 657);…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cragin v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Thompson v. HillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  3. Schreck v. BlunSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  4. Berry v. ClarkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  5. Shahan v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Roy W. Williams and Carl v. IveyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  2. Westbrook v. ComerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  3. Reidling v. HolcombCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  4. Bailey v. MotenSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
  5. Georgia Power Co. v. GreenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API