Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sally Beauty Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Nexxus Products Company, Inc., a California Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided September 26, 1986No. 85-2039Published

1DissentPosner, Circuit Judge

My brethren have decided, with no better foundation than judicial intuition about what businessmen consider reasonable, that the Uniform Commercial Code gives a supplier an absolute right to cancel an exclusive-dealing contract if the dealer is acquired, directly or indirectly, by a competitor of the supplier. I interpret the Code differently.

Nexxus makes products for the hair and sells them through distributors to hair salons and barbershops. It gave a contract to Best, cancellable on any anniversary of the contract with 120 days’ notice, to be its exclusive distributor in Texas. Two years…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Otter Tail Power Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. Brown Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Olympia Equipment Leasing Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  4. Paige v. . FaureNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  5. The United States Shoe Corporation v. Patrick A. Hackett and Rosemary H. HackettCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API