Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Martinmaas v. Engelmann

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 2000No. NonePublished

1ConcurrenceKonenkamp, Justice

[¶ 63.] The method by which we reach a decision is as important as the decision itself. See Karl N. Llewellyn, The Common- Law Tradition, Deciding Appeals 274 (1960). For, whether it be true or false, our method may well shape the outcomes of cases to follow. To decide a question, we first categorize the problem. If a tort, we ask, what type of tort? Both the rules and the consequences applying to one tort may not apply to another. Here, we must distinguish a negligent act from an intentional one, a medical error from" an act of barbarity. If we blur the differences, if we degrade the methods…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United New York & New Jersey Sandy Hook Pilots Ass'n v. HaleckiSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Sunkist Growers, Inc. v. Winckler & Smith Citrus Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Orr v. CrowderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company v. Berkley and Company, Inc., E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company v. Berkley and Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  5. State Ex Rel. Markley v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API