Legal Opinion

Austin v. Dilday

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 1934No. 3062PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This action was commenced by Mary Hortense Proctor to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by reason of defendant’s negligence while riding in an automobile with her.

After the trial of the case but before judgment was rendered, Mrs. Proctor died, and the action was revived in the name of her administrator. The defendant has appealed from the judgment and from the order denying a new trial.

We will first consider the contention that the evidence does not justify the judgment and the findings.

The court found that while the deceased was riding with the defendant as his guest, the…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Judson v. LoveCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  2. McCreery v. EverdingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Valverde v. ValverdeNevada Supreme Court · 1933

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Landmark Hotel & Casino, Inc. v. MooreNevada Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Hampton v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1954
  3. Garibaldi Bros. Trucking Co. v. WaldrenNevada Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API