Legal Opinion

Department of Labor & Industries v. Estate of MacMillan

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 8, 1991No. 57507-0PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.

This case is a consolidated appeal concerning whether the beneficiaries' claims for benefits under the Industrial Insurance Act (the Act) were timely filed. Two trial courts reached different results. After appeals were filed in separate divisions of the Court of Appeals, Mrs. MacMillan and Mrs. Aalmo (the Beneficiaries) moved for transfer to and consolidation in this court. We granted the motion, pursuant to RAP 4.2(a)(4). We find both claims were timely filed.

I

The facts in each case are essentially the same, except for the results reached in the trial courts. David E. MacMillan and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ohler v. Tacoma General HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  2. White v. Johns-Manville Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Ravsten v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Jepson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Singleton v. FrostWashington Supreme Court · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Tunstall v. BergesonWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. WentzWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. WentzWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Intalco Aluminum Corp. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  5. Tunstall Ex Rel. Tunstall v. BergesonWashington Supreme Court · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API