Legal Opinion
Christopher Yu, on behalf of himself and those similarly situated v. Verizon Communications Inc., Verizon New Jersey Inc., Verizon Wireless Services LLC, and Cellco Partnership
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided September 4, 2026No. 2:26-cv-01685Unknown
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CHRISTOPHER YU, on behalf of himself and those similarly situated, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:26-cv-01685 (BRM) (LDW) v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC., OPINION VERIZON NEW JERSEY INC., VERIZON WIRELESS SERVICES LLC, and CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, Defendants. MARTINOTTI, DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is Defendants Verizon Communications Inc., Verizon New Jersey Inc., Verizon Wireless Services LLC, and Cellco Partnership’s (together, “Defendants”) Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay this Action (“Motion”). (ECF No. 9.)…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Guidotti v. Legal Helpers Debt Resolution, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Morgan v. Sundance, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2022
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.