Maryland Reclamation Associates, Inc. v. Harford County
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by HARRELL, Judge, which BELL, C.J., joins.
The Court of Appeals again wimps-out on adopting the doctrine of zoning estoppel, the contours of which are well-established in a number of our sister states. In this latest missed opportunity, Appellant, Maryland Reclamation Associates, Inc. (“MRA”), contends compellingly that we should embrace the principles of zoning estoppel and hold that Appellee, Harford County, is estopped from applying the provisions of Harford County Bill 91-101 to Appellant’s proposed operation of a rubble landfill on Appellant’s property. The Majority…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Pokoik v. SilsdorfNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Pioneer Trust & Savings Bank v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
- People Ex Rel. Skokie Town House Builders, Inc. v. Village of Morton GroveIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
- Hollywood Beach Hotel Co. v. City of HollywoodSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
- County Council v. OffenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.