Legal Opinion

A. Magnano Co. v. Dunbar

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided February 26, 1932No. 458PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtNeterer, District Judge

(after stating the facts).

At the time this case was argued it was stated that, with the final brief, a stipulation of facts would be filed, to the end that the issue may be disposed of upon the merits, avoiding the necessity of reconvening the three-judge court. No stipulation has been filed. The respective parties, in their briefs, say that, if the court denies the motion to dismiss, the facts will be stipulated.

Many of the pertinent facts, arising either directly or collaterally, in this ease, have been fully discussed in The Best Foods, Inc., v. Welch (D. C.) 34 F.(2d) 682.

In view of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chicago Great Western Railway Co. v. KendallSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Best Foods, Inc. v. WelchDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1929
  3. Palmer Bros. v. WeaverDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1924

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. A. Magnano Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API