Legal Opinion · Dissent

Carlin v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 11, 1925Published

1Dissent

It seems to me that the testimony tracing the injury to a bump on a roller in the contrivance on which the plaintiff was riding hardly rises above speculation. But passing that phase of the case, I think that while confining liability, according to the well-settled rule, to a failure to exercise reasonable care under the circumstances before the defendant, the court in effect holds him liable without requiring any such failure to be shown. We have a case in which the defendant has been held liable in heavy damages for an injury which, so far as any evidence shows, never occurred before, and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. City of Dallas v. MaxwellTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  2. Hubbell v. . City of YonkersNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  3. Godfrey v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
  4. Washington, Colesville & Ashton Turnpike Co. v. CaseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1894
  5. Callis v. United Railways & Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1916

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API