Legal Opinion

Martin v. Liquor Control Commission

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1946No. Docket No. 59, Calendar No. 43,424PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

Plaintiffs James F. Martin and June S. Hughey, copartners, own and operate the Penobscot Club in the city of Detroit, where they serve beer, wine and liquor for consumption on the premises, under a class “C” license. The commissioner of police of Detroit, on May 8, 1945, 'filed a complaint with the defendant, Michigan liquor control commission, charging plaintiffs with violation of the rules and regulations of the commission. After a citation issued against them, and a hearing conducted by the members of the commission, plaintiffs ’ license was suspended for a period of six months, effective…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Case v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Slezenger v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1946

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smigel v. Southgate Community School DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Smigel v. Southgate Community School DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API