Legal Opinion

Matthew M. Becker and Anne M. Becker v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Matthew M. Becker and Anne M. Becker

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 5, 1960No. 244, 245, Dockets 25924, 25925PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge.

Taxpayers’ petitions for review, like those in Lynch v. Commissioner, 2 Cir., 1959, 273 F.2d 867, Goodstein v. Commissioner, 1 Cir., 1959, 267 F.2d 127 and Sonnabend v. Commissioner, 1 Cir., 1959, 267 F.2d 319, and the refund suit in Broome v. United States, Ct.C1.1959, 170 F.Supp. 613, involve variants of the plan for reducing income taxes by deductions for the alleged payment of interest on loans to finance the purchase of Government securities devised by M. Eli Livingstone of Boston. The particular plan used by petitioners differed from that in Lynch v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Eli D. Goodstein v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Eli D. GoodsteinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1959
  2. Lynch v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  3. Broome v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959
  4. Schlemmer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Albert Gordon MacRae and Sheila MacRae v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  2. Maxwell Rubin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962
  3. De Woskin v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1960
  4. Leslie H. Jockmus and Esther N. Jockmus v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  5. Barnett v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1965

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API