Legal Opinion

State v. Blank

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 5, 1970PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Defendant was tried and convicted upon'jury trial of the crime of receiving and concealing stolen property. He did not take the witness stand. His sole ground of appeal is that the trial court erred in instructing the jury:

“Every witness who testified is presumed to speak the truth. This presumption, however, may be overcome by. the manner in which he or she testifies, by the character of his or her testimony, by the interest he or she has in the outcome of the case, by contradictory evidence, or by a presumption.”

State v. Kessler, 254 Or 124, 458 P2d 432 (1969), holds that this instruction…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. KesslerOregon Supreme Court · 1969

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. NaughtenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API