State v. Roy
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.
Tbe defendants except to and assign as error tbe failure of tbe court to grant tbeir motion for a continuance. Tbe motion was made on tbe ground tbat a witness, most vital to tbeir defense, was out of tbe State.
It will be noted tbe name of tbe witness was not given nor does it appear tbat any effort was made to secure bis presence at tbe trial. Tbe alleged crime was committed on 29 November, 1950, and an investigation of tbe alleged facts was made shortly thereafter. A true bill was found against both defendants on 8 January, 1951, and tbe cases were called for trial on 11 January, 1951.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. . GibsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- State v. . CreechSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- State v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- State v. . HarveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- State v. BowmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. StephensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- State v. BirckheadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- State v. RaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. VestalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.