Legal Opinion · Dissent

Harwood v. Dysart Consolidated School District

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 8, 1946No. 46726Published

1DissentMiller, J.

(dissenting) — -I am unable to agree with the majority opinion herein and respectfully dissent. As stated by the majority, the trial court relied upon our holding in Flowers v. Independent Sch. Dist., 235 Iowa 332, 16 N. W. 2d 570, but the majority states that that decision' does not purport to rule our decision herein. In this I feel that the majority is in error. While the same identical question was not involved, there was very forceful language in the Flowers opinion which seems to be controlling here. . I think that the Flowers ease was correctly decided, that we should, adhere to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Noble v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  2. Dermit v. Sergeant Bluff Consolidated Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
  3. Flowers v. Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  4. State ex rel. Brand v. MostadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API