Aden v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court 1
THOMAS, Justice.
The sole question presented in this case is whether Aden is entitled to have counsel appointed to represent him in connection with his petition for post-conviction relief. Aden requested that counsel be appointed, but the district court denied his petition for post-conviction relief without appointing counsel. In accordance with recent cases, we reverse the order denying the petition for post-conviction relief and remand this case for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.
In his brief, Aden states the issues to be:
“I. Was appellant denied due process by the…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Thomas.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Cutbirth v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
- Jones v. GarrettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
- Campbell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Tellier v. EdwardsWashington Supreme Court · 1960
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mehring v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Christopher Ray CountsWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
- Mullinax Concrete Service Co. v. ZowadaWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
- Aden v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
- Engberg v. MeyerWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.