Legal Opinion

Aden v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1988No. 87-232PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

THOMAS, Justice.

The sole question presented in this case is whether Aden is entitled to have counsel appointed to represent him in connection with his petition for post-conviction relief. Aden requested that counsel be appointed, but the district court denied his petition for post-conviction relief without appointing counsel. In accordance with recent cases, we reverse the order denying the petition for post-conviction relief and remand this case for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.

In his brief, Aden states the issues to be:

“I. Was appellant denied due process by the…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Thomas.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Cutbirth v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Jones v. GarrettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
  4. Campbell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Tellier v. EdwardsWashington Supreme Court · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mehring v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Christopher Ray CountsWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Mullinax Concrete Service Co. v. ZowadaWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Aden v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Engberg v. MeyerWyoming Supreme Court · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API