Barrow v. Siracusa

DORE, Judge.

This suit is clearly a possessory action, coupled with damages for the illegal removal of a double toilet, or privy, and articles therein stored, and the cultivation of a part of the land in question. There was judgment in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendant quieting their possession, and awarding damages to the amount of $62. Defendant has appealed, and plaintiffs have answered the appeal, praying for an increase of the damages allowed.

The defendant filed several exceptions prior to answer, and which exceptions were overruled. On appeal, the defendant does not ask…