RF & P CORP. v. Little
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Keenan
These appeals arise from the trial court’s interpretation of the Virginia Freedom of Information Act, Codé §§ 2.1-340 to -346.1 (the Act). The specific issues presented are whether the trial court erred: (1) in ruling that the Board of Directors of RF&P Corporation (the RF&P Board) is a “public body,” within the meaning of the Act; (2) in finding that Jacqueline G. Epps willfully and knowingly violated the Act; and (3) in awarding George B. Little costs and attorney’s fees of $133,170.55 under the Act.
I
In December 1991, Little filed his petition for injunctive and other relief under the Act,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. MurdockSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Cheatle v. Rudd's Swimming Pool Supply Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1987
- Mullins v. Richlands National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1991
- Tazewell Oil Co. v. United Virginia Bank/Crestar BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1992
- Bowers v. Westvaco Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Horton v. HortonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1997
- W. S. Carnes, Inc. v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1996
- Advanced Marine Enterprises, Inc. v. PRC Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1998
- Tuomala v. Regent UniversitySupreme Court of Virginia · 1996
- Little v. CookeSupreme Court of Virginia · 2007
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.