Legal Opinion

Commonwealth National Bank v. Boetzelen

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 25, 1985No. 00334 Harrisburg, 1983PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HESTER, Judge:

This action involves a motion to strike a judgment entered against appellants Hans and Ernst Boetzelen. The judgment was based upon a Guaranty Agreement containing a warrant of attorney. It is from the denial of appellants’ motion that this appeal ensued.

Appellants are the President and Vice-President respectively of Ernie Fence Supply Company. On January 22, 1971, appellants, in their capacities as corporate officers, signed a note for $46,788.48 with Commonwealth National Bank, appellee herein. In September, 1971, at appellee’s request, appellants signed a Guaranty Agreement,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cutler Corp. v. LatshawSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Frantz Tractor Co. v. Wyoming Valley NurserySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Triangle Building Supplies & Lumber Co. v. ZermanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Integrity Title Insurance, Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. RauSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  5. SOLEBURY NAT. BK., NEW HOPE v. CairnsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Germantown Savings Bank v. TalackiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Manor Building Corp. v. Manor Complex Associates, Ltd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Dollar Bank v. Northwood Cheese Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Stahl Oil Co. v. HelselSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Hertzog v. JungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API