Legal Opinion

Hoyt v. Hampe

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 15, 1925Published

1Opinion

The very earnest argument made by defendants in support of petition for rehearing has had the consideration of the court in re-examination of applicable equitable principles and authorities.

That the policyholder is a creditor from the date of his policy, see In re Assignment of Rea, 82 Iowa 231, 238; Nichols v.Harsh, 202 Iowa 117; Gallagher v. Asphalt Co. of Am., 65 N.J. Eq. 258 (55 A. 259, 260); Herrick v. Wardwell, 58 Ohio St. 294 (50 N.E. 903, 906); Graeber v. Sides, 151 N.C. 596 (66 S.E. 600);Carr v. Davis, 64 W. Va. 522 (63 S.E. 326, 328); Brown v.Hitchcock, 36 Ohio St. 667, 678; 27…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. . FinchNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Bosworth v. . AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. McIver v. Young Hardware Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  4. Dawson v. National Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  5. Savage v. . MurphyNew York Court of Appeals · 1866

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API