Legal Opinion

City of St. Louis v. Long

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 19, 1965No. 31826PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Judge.

This appeal involves the alleged violation of certain ordinances of the City of St. Louis. In an information filed by the City Counselor it was charged that on or about March 2,1963, at or near 3965a Olive Street, within said City, defendant did unlawfully receive money for her promise or agreement to engage in illicit sexual intercourse, in violation of Ordinance 50549, Sections 773.010 and 1.100 of the Revised Ordinances of 1960 of the City. The transcript filed here does not show the result reached in the Municipal Court, but in the Court of Criminal Correction, to which…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kansas City v. MartinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963
  2. City of St. Louis v. AmelnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  3. City of St. Louis v. YoungSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  4. Cox v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1848
  5. Williams v. City of St. JosephMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. City of Kansas City v. NarronMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. State v. EllisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. State v. KennedyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. State v. LinderMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Kansas City v. PlumbMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API