Legal Opinion
In Re Schneider
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 14, 1893PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
148 U.S. 157
13 S.Ct. 572
37 L.Ed. 404
In re SCHNEIDER.
No. ____.
March 14, 1893.
Jeremiah M. Wilson, William F. Mattingly, and A. A. Hoehling, Jr., for petitioner.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 158-162 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Chief Justice FULLER.
1
The application for a writ of error or appeal is denied upon the authority of Cross v. Burke, 146 U. S. 82, 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 22; In re Heath, 144 U. S. 92, 12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 615; In re Cross, 146 U. S. 271, 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 109; Cross v. U. S., 145 U. S. 571, 12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 842. See, also, Railroad Co. v. Grant, 98 U. S. 398; Dennison v. Alexander,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Railroad Co. v. GrantSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Cross v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Passavant v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- In Re HeathSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Cross v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dorsey v. GillCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
- Edmondson v. BradyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
- United States v. SchneiderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1893
- Brown v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Friedberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.