United Fruit Co. v. Pillsbury
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
LOUDERBACK, District Judge.
This case involves an interpretation of the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act March 4, 1927, c. 569, § 22, 44 Stat. 1437, 33 USCA § 922. The-facts aro as follows: One Bert King was in the employ of the United Fruit Company on September 2,1930, at San Francisco Harbor in the Thirteenth Compensation District, and while performing stevedoring services for said employer on board the steamship San Mateo, then afloat upon navigable waters of the United States, sustained accidental injury arising out of and in the course of said employment, which injury…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Pillsbury v. ALASKA PACKERS ASS'N.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Arrow Stevedore Co. v. PillsburyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
- Didier v. Crescent Wharf & Warehouse Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1936
- Fowler v. W. G. Const. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1947
- Pacific Employers Ins. v. PillsburyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.