Legal Opinion

Midkiff v. Tom

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided May 8, 1979No. Civ. 79-0096PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

SAMUEL P. KING, District Judge.

The Trustees of the Estate of Bernice Pauahi Bishop 1 filed suit in this court on February 28, 1979, against the Commissioners and Executive Director of the Hawaii Housing Authority 2 and the Hawaii Housing Authority 3 itself, praying for a declaration that the Hawaii Land Reform Act 4 be declared unconstitutional.

A temporary restraining order against implementation of mandatory arbitration was granted pending a hearing and decision on a preliminary injunction. 5 That hearing was held on April 24-27, 1979.

Motions to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Green v. FrazierSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. Clark v. NashSupreme Court of the United States · 1905

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Midkiff v. TomDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1979
  2. Housing Finance & Development Corp. v. Harold K.L. Castle FoundationHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. AUTO. IMPORTERS OF AMERICA, INC. v. State of Minn.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1988
  4. Automobile Importers of America, Inc. v. MinnesotaDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1988
  5. Midkiff v. TomCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API