Ervin v. Ervin

ON REHEARING

Appellant’s motion for rehearing contends that this Court erred in finding that her quitclaim deed released all of her claims, as of its date of execution, for reimbursement for any enhancement in the value of the property described in that instrument. She cites the recent case of Anderson v. Gilliland, 624 S.W.2d 243 (Tex.Civ.App.—Dallas 1981) in which the Dallas Court held that:

(N)o matured right of equitable reimbursement for community expenditures on separate property arose until dissolution of the community. It follows, therefore, that the quitclaim deed at the time of…