Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Bryant

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1983No. 55723Published

1DissentJustice Goldenhersh

I dissent and would affirm the judgment of the appellate court. I agree with the appellate court that the photographic identification employed in this case was impermissibly and unnecessarily suggestive.

The majority states: “More importantly, the evidence shows that Norma Lederer’s out-of-court identification was reliable.” (94 Ill. 2d at 520.) Considering that when she made the identification she had already been shown the clothing taken from defendant, that she was shown a Polaroid photograph, and admittedly the mask worn by the robber to a great extent covered his features, this is, at…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. BryantAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API