Legal Opinion

Battle v. Clanton

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 3, 1975No. 757SC469PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

A judgment on the pleadings was inappropriate. The complaint' was not fatally defective, and it appears that matters outside the pleadings were presented to and considered by the court. Under these circumstances the motion for judgment on thé pleadings must be treated as a motion for summary judgment. G.S. 1A-1, Rule 12 (c).

Summary judgment for the defendant Stallings was entered by the trial court on the basis of the release filed by the plaintiff and his attorney in consideration of the payment of the policy limits of $15,000 made by the insurer of the defendants Clanton and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hasselrode v. GnageySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Peters v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  3. Nicola Panichella v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Warner Brothers Pictures, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
  4. Sell Ex Rel. Bason v. HotchkissSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. Canillas v. Joseph H. Carter, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Alsup v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Neves v. PotterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  3. Cunningham v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Sims v. Honda Motor Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  5. McInnis v. Harley-Davidson Motor Co., Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1986

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API