Legal Opinion
Murray v. Armour
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 25, 1988PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
The parties entered into a contract for the sale of the subject premises on March 21, 1986. The contract provided that it was expressly conditioned upon the purchaser obtaining a mortgage in the sum of 80% of the purchase price. The contract further provided as follows:
"(c) Purchaser shall have 45 days from date Purchaser receives copy of this contract duly signed by Seller, to secure the above mortgage loan commitment, with an extension of seven (7) days, if necessary;
"(d) In the event Purchaser cannot secure said commitment within the time herein specified, either party hereto shall have…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Huntington Mining Holdings, Inc. v. Cottontail Plaza, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Huntington Mining Holdings, Inc. v. Cottontail Plaza, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Lieberman v. PettinatoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Livoti v. MallonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Kramer v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Schatten v. BriedisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990