Sweeney v. Arrowsmith
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 220, Oct. T., 1909, by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, from order of C. P. Berks Co., Jan. T., 1909, No. 27, disallowing the claim by the commonwealth in the distribution of a fund in the Matter of Pamelia C. Sweeney v. Arthur V. Arrowsmith, with notice to The Pendora Park Company, Terre-Tenant. Exception to order of distribution.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 220, Oct. T., 1909, by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, from order of C. P. Berks Co., Jan. T., 1909, No. 27, disallowing the claim by the commonwealth in the distribution of a fund in the Matter of Pamelia C. Sweeney v. Arthur V. Arrowsmith, with notice to The Pendora Park Company, Terre-Tenant. Exception to order of distribution. Endlich, P. J., filed the following opinion: On February 15, 1908, plaintiff conveyed to defendant a certain property in the city of Reading, taking from him at the same time a mortgage for part of the purchase money. Incumbered by this mortgage the…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Oblad y, J.,
After a careful examination of this record, a majority of the court are of the opinion that the conclusion reached by the court below is a correct one, and the judgment is therefore affirmed.
2Cited by10 opinions
- Harper v. Consolidated Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Beckman v. Altoona Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Scranton Lackawanna Trust Co. v. Scranton Lackawanna Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Potter Title & Trust Co. v. International Penn Collieries Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Somerset County1949
- Citizens National Bank v. Nease, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Washington County1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.