Legal Opinion

State v. Olson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 22, 1935No. 30,579PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Loeing, Justice.

Defendant appeals from an order - denying Ms motion for a new trial after a verdict of guilty had been rendered against him in a forgery prosecution.

Defendant was an attorney at law and notary public in the city of Minneapolis and was indicted for forgery in the first degree on a charge of falsely certifying that one Hiller, whose name was forged thereto, had executed and acknowledged a real estate mortgage extension agreement.

The history of the case is lengthy, but since defendant, on this appeal, does not assert that the verdict is not justified by the evidence, it may be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. DurnamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. WyssWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. In Re Disbarment of Arthur E. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  4. State v. ColesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  5. State v. ThiemeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API