Legal Opinion

Carmon Earl Puryear v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 29, 1967No. 23609_1PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant Puryear and co-defendant Estes were found guilty by jury verdict of having transported a stolen automobile in interstate commerce with knowledge that it had been stolen in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2312.

The primary contention raised by appellant’s able court-appointed counsel concerns the admissibility, under Escobedo, 1 of certain remarks made by appellant to the arresting officer before he had been told of his right to remain silent and to have the benefit of counsel. No objection was made at trial to the admission of the testimony now complained of. We are asked, however, to hold…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Young v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
  3. United States v. Jules GordonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
  4. Patrice Bouchard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  5. Gregorio Vega De Luna v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert Edward LipscombCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  2. Paulino Izaguirre Rojas v. Robert Richardson, Kenneth McGee and M and R Cattle Company, a PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  3. United States v. Severiano Olivarez Gonzalez, United States of America v. Vincente Carrerra, A/K/A Severiano OlivaresCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  4. United States v. Aubrey Jerald GordonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  5. United States v. Samuel Ratner, Albert Ratner, and Wyngate & Bevins, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API