Mills v. Roosevelt Raceway, Inc.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
1Per curiam
The jury’s verdict established that plaintiff presented a winning ticket to defendant’s agent strictly in compliance with defendant’s rules and regulations and was thereafter disabled from completing performance by reason of the agent’s default.
The simple liability of a principal for the fault of his agent when acting within the scope of this authority has not been abrogated by the Pari-Mutuel Law. In contrast with cases relied upon by respondent this is not a case to recover a bet, outside the scope of said law. The essence of plaintiff’s charge is that there was a tortious interference with…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Karafa v. NJ State Lottery Comm.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
- Molina v. Games Management ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Bastone v. Yonkers Racing Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1973
- Leavy v. Games Management ServiceCivil Court of the City of New York · 1980
- Seltzer v. New York Racing Ass'nCivil Court of the City of New York · 1987