Legal Opinion

Mills v. Roosevelt Raceway, Inc.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 17, 1970PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The jury’s verdict established that plaintiff presented a winning ticket to defendant’s agent strictly in compliance with defendant’s rules and regulations and was thereafter disabled from completing performance by reason of the agent’s default.

The simple liability of a principal for the fault of his agent when acting within the scope of this authority has not been abrogated by the Pari-Mutuel Law. In contrast with cases relied upon by respondent this is not a case to recover a bet, outside the scope of said law. The essence of plaintiff’s charge is that there was a tortious interference with…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Karafa v. NJ State Lottery Comm.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  2. Molina v. Games Management ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. Bastone v. Yonkers Racing Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1973
  4. Leavy v. Games Management ServiceCivil Court of the City of New York · 1980
  5. Seltzer v. New York Racing Ass'nCivil Court of the City of New York · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API